February 27, 2008

Atheism: More Antagonistic Than Homosexuality and Evolution Combined!

Posted in Skepticism, Writing tagged , , , , , , , , , , , at 1:25 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

At least, that’s the way it can seem. As someone who keeps tabs on all three topics, I’m always stunned at how much people can get riled up by an atheist (even one who isn’t particularly argumentative or offensive!). I’m also bemused at how an otherwise friendly, rational-seeming Christian can end a conversation with ‘Oh and by the way, you might not want to go to heaven, but I sure do. So you’d better repent quickly!’ – or something to that effect. What? Threats? I thought only God was allowed to do that!

Anyway, I thought this cartoon was priceless. I’ve also noticed that no Creationists took a shot at the challenge in one of my previous posts, so to reiterate: I was being entirely serious with it. Come on, you guys love to take shots at evolution, right? Surely you can put that much effort into building a case for your own theory hypothesis quackery.

I’ve been re-reading ‘The Subtle Knife’ because the parts at the beginning of the book, where Will finds himself in Citagazze, are quite similar to a lot of stuff in my own book (in terms of mood, not content). It always amazes me when I re-read an author who I last checked out before I started to write seriously. I think that if you write enough, and particularly if you read a lot of what other amateur writers put on the internet, you inevitably become a critic. I had always thought that there was something unusual about Pullman’s style, but it’s only now that I appreciate what.

Basically, he writes with an extraordinary richness that has nothing to do with the words he’s using. He tends to use short, even simple sentences, and is quite direct. The depth comes from the story itself, and he conjures detail and life out of a few ordinary words. I’ve always much preferred this approach than using a lot of eloquent adjectives and long-windedness (I’m looking at you, Tolkien), and it’s what I’d like to get with my own writing. Not now, obviously, but at some point in the future.

I have a very odd phobia that I’d like to write about here. If you don’t like self-indulgence, just skip on past to whatevr it is I ramble about next (I’m using this as a ‘warm-up’ for my writing for the day, which is why it’s probably only half-coherent). You know those nature shows about sharks and fish and whales? I can’t watch those. In fact, I wanted to get a picture of a basking shark here to illustrate what I maean (because of their size they tend to be photographed with a lot of empty blue ocean in the background, which is really what freaks me out), but I literally couldn’t look at the picture long enough to get the URL.

Now, this isn’t too much of a problem unless someone ever puts a gun to my head and tells me to go scuba diving in the pacific, except that it’s not just ocean pictures that do it. I was reading about the Cassini space probe yesterday, and decided to take a look at some of the Jupiter photos. And wouldn’t you know it, but there tends to be a lot of black space in the background? This picture was even worse. It’s a picture of Eta Carinae, a massive double star, surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula. Fascinating. Beautiful. So terrifying that it had me hyperventillating when I accidentally opened the large version.

This irrational fear has gotten progressively worse in recent years, to the point where I start to get nervous if I’m reading something with a possibility of a picture that will freak me out. If I get a National Geographic, I read the contents page meticulously to make sure there are no stories about ocean wildlife, lest I accidentally find myself on a double-spread photo of a shark floating in the blue void.

Rest-assured, though, that I’m not crazy in any other ways, unless you count trying to write a novel as a mental illness.

Current word count for [untilted]: 20,010

Target word count for the end of the day: 22,000


February 26, 2008

Scientific Progress Goes BOINC

Posted in Writing tagged , , , , , , at 10:09 am by lifelessonsfromwriting

Berkley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing, that is. I’ve been loaning my spare processor cycles (of which there are many – seriously, OpenOffice is the most taxing thing I ever run) to the SETI@Home project. I’ve always said that I want to live long enough see life on other planets discovered, if it is indeed out there, so I might as well lend a hand.

I overdid it a bit with the writing last night, in that I went nearly 900 words over what I had intended and stayed up until 2.30am to do it. Luckily I’m not working at the moment thanks to a distinct lack of having a job, but that’s not going to last much longer if I can help it. I figure I need to get as much writing done now, while I have no other obligations, as I possibly can.

I started writing [untitled] (it will get a name, I swear) on February the 14th. It’s now the 26th, which means that I’ve been working on it for a whole twelve days. If you divide 20,000 (my target word count for the day) by 12, you come out with the following number:


Well, I thought it was interesting… (Hey, maybe that should be my title, with the subtitle ‘Seriously, don’t get your hopes up.’ Do you think a publisher would go for it?)

Current word count for [untitled]: 19,031.

Target word count by the end of the day: 20,000

Current word count for [untitled]: 20,010

February 25, 2008

‘Flash’ Fiction

Posted in Reading, Writing tagged , , , , , , , , , , , at 8:57 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

So, I’ve recently been reading a lot of ‘flash fiction’, which is not, as I had hoped, Flash Gordon fan-fiction; no, it’s terribly literary, Joyce-like stuff. (‘Joyce-like’ in the sense that the stories tend to end with startling abruptness and value unusual structures over actual content. That’s right, I went there).

All joking aside, however, I think flash fiction is great. It lets writers tell a story or present an idea quickly, and I can well imagine that the skills people pick up writing this way can carry over to writing longer fiction, where you can be far more indulgant and long-winded. I’ll give it a shot now and then, so expect to see some actual fiction up here soon.

I’ve been struggling lately with the issue of novel length. Not because I’m worried about hurting the book’s chance of being published (my writing will no doubt do enough damage on its own), but because the story could work either as a single, fairly long book or as two medium-length ones. I’m leaning towards the latter; there’s a very definite ‘cutting off’ point where one stage of the story ends and the next begins, and I can’t imagine simply moving on to a new chapter once I’ve reached that point. It’s hard to describe, but it feels as if doing that wouldn’t do it justice, somehow.

Of course, that’s a concern for the future. Right now it’s nearly nine o’ clock in the evening and I’ve spent most of the day writing in comments sections here. Admittedly that adds up to several thousand words output, but it’s not moving the novel forward any.

Continuing with my non-fiction reading streak, I’m planning on starting Carl Sagan’s Cosmos tonight. I was planning on checking out Pale Blue Dot because I was actually looking at the pale blue dot photo, but I’ve apparently lost the copy I bought years ago. I’ve been a huge fan of Sagan’s work ever since reading The Demon Haunted World, which I would encourage everyone to read. More than any other writer I know of, Sagan was incredibly good at sharing the sense wonder and awe inherent in any study of the Universe.

Current word count for [untitled]: 17, 534

Target word count by the end of the day: 18,100

Current word count for [untitled]: 19,031. Booya. Tomorrow I’m going for 20k.

PS: If you’re a fan of Yeats (and you should be!) and have read his poem An Irish Airman Forsees His Death, track down a copy of Keane’s song ‘A Bad Dream’. You’ll get a kick out of it, trust me 😉

Debate Topics

Posted in Skepticism, Writing tagged , , , , , , , at 12:39 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

It’s a bit late, but here’s a run down of some of the debates/arguments I’ve been having on WordPress:


Of course. This one seems to crop up everywhere, despite the fact that, in the scientific community, one side has completely destroyed the other evidence-wise (guess which one!). The main thing I’ve noticed is that, overwhelmingly, those who argue against evolution know almost nothing about it. A discussion with a Creationist might run something like this:

Creationist: Show me evidence that life formed spontaneously out of non-life!

Evolutionist: That’s…not evolution. It’s abiogenesis. And actually, that’s not even what abiogenesis says happened, so you’re off the mark even if-

Creationist: You can’t do it, can you?! I knew it! Until someone proves to me that life can come from non-life without Divine intervention, I’ll smugly wallow in my own overbearing ignorance!

I may have editorialized slightly there, but you get the idea.

Of course, Creationists demand the impossible. There is nowhere where the geological column is complete, and there will always be gaps in the fossil record (if only because any fossil found to fill a gap simply creates two more; for a truly ‘complete’ picture, we’d nee d a fossil of every organism that ever lived, which obviously isn’t going to happen). What’s funny is that Creationists like to demand evidence of a far higher caliber than they themselves are able to provide. I have yet to see any physical evidence that life was divinely begun. What’s that? If you disprove evolution, don’t you then ‘prove’ that God must have created the Universe?

Well, no. Evidence against one theory is not evidence for another. You will note that, when pressed for evidence for evolution, scientists do not immediately attack the evidence for Creationism (mostly because there isn’t any). Creationism, meanwhile, is built entirely on disproving evolution.

So, here’s a challenge for Creationists: show me physical, scientific evidence (in other words, not the Bible) for the idea that God created life on Earth that could not also be used as evidence for the idea that a giant, omnipotent space-shrimp created life on Earth. You may draw on any branch of science you wish, but the evidence must be physical (for example, a fossil or genetic comparison between two species), testable, and must adequately explain the process by which life was created and developed.

And before someone says ‘oh, we don’t make any claims about which omnipotent, divine creator started life, two points: firstly, nobody believes your bullshit. You’re talking about the Christian God. Secondly, if that was your stance it would fail utterly as a scientific theory unless it described the nature and mechanics of how a Divine creator worked; claiming to not want to describe the Creator would be like evolutionary scientists saying ‘Oh, we believe in evolution, but we can’t and won’t even hazard a guess as to what mechanism it works by. Natural selection? Nope, we’re not going to research that’.

The challenge will be open indefinitely, so if you come across this six months from now, feel free to leave a comment.


I’m gay, but I don’t usually get into many debates about it with people. A lot of people who dislike homosexuality are religious, and there’s little point in arguing with them; they’ve got the Bible or the Qu’ran, they believe what it says, and there’s little anyone can do to change that. The other reason is that it’s just not that big a deal. We’re coming very close to the days when anti-homosexuality sentiment will be viewed in the same light as sexism or racism, but only in some Western countries. I’ve always felt that the area people need to be making a difference in is in the Middle East and parts of Africa and Asia; let’s not forget that homosexuals in those places can be imprisoned or even killed for who they are. How many of us in ‘the West’ have that problem?

However, I’ve noticed that a few people have some odd ideas about homosexuality. I’ll summarize them here:

It’s all about the sex. Actually, it’s not. This one crops up most often among religious people, who seem to fixate solely on the actual act of having homosexual sex. That’s taking too simplistic a view of it; even if a gay man stops having sex with other men, he’s not going to spontaneously stop being attracted to them. He’s just going to be very frustrated at never being able to act on those feelings.

It’s a choice. The old chestnut. I don’t know how many times religious people have to be told that it isn’t before they’ll believe it. I’m willing to bet that some people actually do choose to be gay for reasons of their own, but the vast majority of gay people don’t. I mean, ask yourself how many people would have willingly chosen persecution and distrust in sixties or seventies? If it’s a choice, why do religious people then talk about people ‘struggling’ with it? Why can’t they just ‘choose’ heterosexuality?

The inevitable comparison to paedophilia. You’d think this one would have died off by now, but apparently the Boys Beware mentality is alive and kicking. This comes in two flavours: those who think that gay men are more likely to molest children (based on the reasoning that any man who molests a boy is gay), and those who, to discredit homosexuality, put it on the same leve as paedophilia (‘Paedophilia isn’t a choice either; why don’t we let them have sex with whoever they want?).

The first has been debunked by many people who actually work with sex offenders. The second can be debunked by anyone with more than a dozen pair of brain cells to rub together; I leave it as an excersize for the reader to complete in his or her own time.

(Incidentally, is that video actually real? Several people seem to think it is, but I really have my doubts.)

February 24, 2008

Sunday Tradition

Posted in Skepticism, Writing tagged , , , , , , at 12:11 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

Even though the Catholic Church’s hook-like claws are slowly being pried away from Ireland’s collective psyche (to surprisingly little fanfare), people still treat Sunday as the day where you don’t do all that much. I’ve decided to make full use of that noble tradition, so I won’t be writing anything at all today (except perhaps in argumentative comments on here – more on that later).

On days when I don’t write, I usually spent a lot of time thinking through storylines in my head and making sure that everything flows well (and that there aren’t any glaring contradictions or holes; sadly, there often are). I also plan out the next few scenes I’m going to write in detail, during which I usually end up either changing them fairly drastically or adding subplots that I hadn’t intended on using at all. Just yesterday I had one of my characters become something of a renegade because I realized it would get her involved with everything else that’s going on in a much more satisfying way.

Strangely enough, doing everything ‘on the fly’ like this is quite satisfying, especially when it all meshes together into a coherent whole. When it doesn’t…well, that’s slightly less satisfying.

I’ve been having a few mini-debates here on WordPress over the last few days. I like a good debate more than most people, and they’ve been quite interesting. I’ll post some thoughts on that later today, but for now, here’s an interesting blog I found in the course of my browsing:

BuelahMan’s Redstate Revolt

A blog with the catchy tagline ‘A Redneck’s Guide to Reversing the Rightwing Brainwashing’. That pretty much sums it up, and the author discusses a wide variety of topics in a witty (and often scathing) way that’s quite refreshing when compares to some more heavy-handed political blogs.

February 23, 2008

Warning: High School Education Required

Posted in Writing tagged , , , , at 3:43 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

Apparently, a high school-level education is required to understand my blog. Observe:

blog readability test

I’m not sure whether that’s a good thing or not.

Over the last few days I’ve been writing a lot more than I usually would, mainly because of the word count targets I’ve been setting myself here. I always knew that I needed quiet and privacy to write, but it’s gotten to the stage where I need everyone else in the house to either be asleep or far enough away that I can’t hear them moving around – and God help anyone who actually comes in to talk to me while I’m in the middle of an imporant scene.

I imagine I’m not the only person with this problem. The solution, I think, is obvious: I must build a completely self-sustainable high-altitude zeppelin, from which I can write in absolute peace. If you’d like to donate to ‘Project Helium’, just call my toll-free number.

Current word count for [untilted]: 17, 032

Target word count by the end of the day: 17, 500 (A relatively low target today, since I have to go to a 21st birthday party later. Not that I want to, of course, but apparently it would be rude to not show up.)

Current word count for [untitled]: 17, 534

A Heavenly Rain of Angelic Bullshit

Posted in Skepticism tagged , , , , , , , at 12:03 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

There’s a thriving (and worrying) ‘angel’ industry in Ireland at the moment, and I have no reason to think that it’s not happening in other parts of the world, too. Walk into any bookstore and look for the ‘Gullible’ section (usually called something like ‘Paranormal’ or, my favourite, ‘Mind, Body & Spririt’). You’ll find all of the usual crap that you’d expect — tarot cards, astrology books, books about psychic pets — as well as many, many books about ‘angels’.

They aren’t what you’d think. When most people hear ‘angel’ they think of some form of Christianity, at least here in the West. What I’m talking about, though, is more of a New Age free-for-all. I’ve seen angels mixed in with crackpot UFO conspiracy theories, psychic healing and ‘magick’. There are even ‘angel cards’, which seem to be tarot cards given a veneer of the religious. You can tell this stuff is BS just by glancing at it, yet there are actually shops over here devoted to nothing but ‘angel’ paraphanalia.

On the off chance that you’ve never come across this, here are a few choice exampls from Amazon:

Psychic Healing with Angels and Spirit Guides by Diane Stein. The title is pretty self-explanatory; according to a commentor on that page, it contains information about ‘clearing cords and psychic attacks’. That sounds like the kind of handy, practical information everyone should know!

Emotional Healing With Angels: A Spiritual Guide to Knowing, Healing, and Freeing Your True Self by Rekha Vidyarthi

The title of this one is a bit of a mouthful. Apparently it’s ‘A complete guide to emotional and spiritual healing and self-liberation by working with the Angels to understand and heal the hidden causes of long-standing emotional patterns and traumas.’

Angels & Spirit Guides Healing Meditations

An audiobook by Sylvia Browne, queen of claptrap. If you’ve never heard of her, count yourself lucky.

And, to give you some idea of what this stuff is all about, here’s what I found after a quick search on WordPress:

“Remove hate from your life. Become neutral in your thoughts, without ego judgments or opinions. Both are obstacles that literally keep you from being a centered being. They create static in your connection to Spirit.

As long as obstacles block clear communication, you limit your ability to connect with your highest calling. Blessings will also be limited because of their inability to navigate freely to you. The power that creates blessings travels through the beams of light unfettered when the channel is clear.”

I couldn’t agree more.

That’s from Solaryium Analytika, a blog that seems to be filled exclusively with bullshit. The author actually does mention things like God and hell, but I’m not sure how many mainstream religious people would agree about the ‘beams of light’ stuff

There’s nothing in itself all that wrong with the ‘angel’ phenomenom. It’s basically a religion for people who aren’t religious, something that’s true of a lot of these New Age beliefs. What irritates me, though, is how unlikely its proponents are to question it. What, angels and spirit guides? Of course they’re true. I’ve actually heard people on the bus be introduced to this kind of thing by their friends, and not once have I heard someone say ‘Hang on, how do you know all of this is actually real?’ That would be rude.

I’m glad that Catholicism is losing its grip on Ireland. God knows it gave us enough problems that this angel stuff couldn’t hope to reproduce. But it’s not a good indicator of society when anything, no matter how idiotic or unlikely, is taken at face value simply because some jackass wrote a book about it. I don’t particularly want to live in a society of credulous children.

February 22, 2008

Word Count Works

Posted in Reading, Writing tagged , , , , , , at 12:00 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

So, for the past few days I’ve been setting myself a challenge here by putting how many words I’d like to have written by the end of the day. I wasn’t really expecting it to work, but much earlier this morning I really put it to the test. Basically, due to a number of issues (none of which were all-encompassing laziness, I swear), I ended up with nothing written at 1.1oam. I was tired and really, really wanted to go to bed, but I had promised myself that I’d write about 500 words first. What to do?

If I hadn’t set myself a target for the day, I can guarantee you that I wouldn’t have written anything at all. Instead, I ended up writing well over what I had intended. (We’ll not say anything about the actual quality of that writing…)

As the title of this post suggests, the ‘word count’ method seems to work for me. With that in mind, scroll to the bottom of this post and gaze upon the truly epic target that I’ve set myself today. Or alternatively, read my little rant first:

This is probably the dumbest book I’ve seen for a long time, and I once tried to read ‘A Million Little Pieces’. The title, the subject matter, the fact that Russel Brand is on the cover…it really hasn’t got anything going for it. The original manuscript should have been ejected into space as soon as Brand finished it.

Predictably enough, it’s a best seller in Ireland. I suppose the picture on the cover helped potential buyers identify with the author. Either that or they thought they were looking at a mirror and decided they could do with a new one. It’s a sad day when people are entertained by the self-indulgent rantings of some jackass who got famous despite looking and acting as if both sides of his brain melted together from drug overdose.

In other news, Why People Believe Weird Things is a very interesting read, although I’m a bit too framiliar with some of the topics to learn anything new from several of the chapters. Since Ireland seems to be enjoying a bumper crop of what could charitably be called ‘weird things’, I might pull a Shermer and cover one or two of them here.

Current word count for [untitled]: 14, 423

Target word count for the end of the day: 17,000

Current word count: 17, 038 (Success! And now, I’m going to sleep!)

February 21, 2008

Hot, Writing-on-Writing Action!

Posted in Reading, Writing tagged , , , , , at 7:29 pm by lifelessonsfromwriting

Writing itself is, strangely enough, a surprisingly difficult thing to write about. There are endless amounts of books, magazines and websites that will supposedly teach you how to write, but most people will tell you that the vast majority are fairly pointless. In fact, they’re all pointless on their own; if someone reads twenty of the best writing books in the world, then immediately attempts to write their first 5,000 word story, ever, you can be fairly certain that the result will suck. Badly.

Writing books are only useful when they go hand-in-hand with lots of practice, and this is assuming that whoever wrote the book is good at teaching in the first place. Unfortunately, merely being a good writer yourself doesn’t automatically make you good at teaching other people how to do it.

Having said that, I’ve come across a few books in my time that actually are very good, and which have greatly helped me improve my writing. I’ll add to this list as time goes on, so let me know if you’ve got a suggestion:

How to Write Science Fiction and Fantasy by Orson Scott Card

Obviously, this one is mainly of interest to those who want to write some form of SF (‘speculative fiction’), but it has a lot of excellent general advice as well. Of particular interest is the section on the ‘MICE quotient’, which really opened my eyes about how it’s possible to wreck your own story long before you even start writing it. (Possibly not what the author intended, but I mainly remember thing ‘Crap, I’m writing a Character story as if it was a Milieu one!’ upon reading this for the first time).

Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, Second Edition: How to Edit Yourself Into Print by Renni Browne & Dave King

This book is fantastic. Written by two professional editors, it takes you through a common mistakes that fiction writers make and gives you numerous ideas on how to correct them. The language is clear and, above all, concise (they don’t waffle needlessly), and it even has some entertaining little cartoons in each chapter!

Get your hands on a copy of this, read it, then immediately go through your own work-in-progress and be horrified at just how many of the mistakes listed in the book you’ve made.

Word Count for [untitled]: 13,571

Target word count for the end of the day: 14,200

Current word count for [untilted]: 14, 423

Finishing Books

Posted in Reading tagged , , , , at 11:28 am by lifelessonsfromwriting

Every reader tends to have their own opinion on finishing a book. A lot of people feel that they need to finish something once they’ve started it (unless it’s really atrocious, or only becomes atrocious halfway through) while those on the other end of the scale will toss a book on page ten if it doesn’t seem interesting enough.

I’m much closer to the latter.  While I’ll give any book a fair chance, I’m reluctant to invest in something if I don’t think it’s going to be worth the time. I’ve recently done this with George R. R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire. Medieval fantasy with kings and lords? Blah. Not my cup of tea.

I also stopped reading The Stand at about page 250 (somewhere around the third monumental flashback), which is unusual because I usually like King’s stuff. A few weeks ago, I also got most of the way through What I Was by Meg Rosoff before stopping, mostly because of a sneaking suspicion that she ripped off another book that I read a while ago and liked much  more (Lucas by Kevin Brooks, in case you’ve read both and would like to give your two cents).

There seems to be a pattern to my reading habits, though. If I’m hard at work on writing something, as I am now, I’m far less likely to finish a book than if I’m not writing anything in particular. I don’t know if it’s because I don’t want to risk letting someone else’s writing style ‘influence’ mine or if I’m just too tired of looking at words to do it for hours on end, but I can pretty much forget about reading if I’ve written for more than three or four hours that day.

Strangely, though, I have no problem reading non-fiction while I’m like this. I’ve recently started to read Why People Believe Weird Things  (take that, Objectivists!) and had no trouble ploughing through a few interesting chapters. Apparently I only have room in my brain for one fictional universe at once!

Previous page · Next page